<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sony Alphas: Viable competition for Canon and Nikon?</title>
	<link>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/</link>
	<description>Ugo Cei's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: e73a1cd3c23c</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-184002</link>
		<dc:creator>e73a1cd3c23c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-184002</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;e73a1cd3c23c...&lt;/strong&gt;

e73a1cd3c23c5881bf66...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>e73a1cd3c23c&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>e73a1cd3c23c5881bf66&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Nixon</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-158847</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-158847</guid>
		<description>I have a Sony point and shoot digital camera which has done very nicely for what it is.  I don't own a Sony DSLR.  I can say, however, that I do own many Nikon DSLRs.  I own the D70, D80, 3 D300s, and a D2X.  

I can say that in the $1,000 range, there is not much that touches the D80 when used with my Nikon glass.  Using cheaper lenses, I am sure the Sony does a great job, but when I use the 17-55 2.8 or the 70-200 2.8 on the D80, it is stunning to say the least.

I have not compared the Canon DSLRs in this range, but I just wanted to leave a quick comment.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Sony point and shoot digital camera which has done very nicely for what it is.  I don&#8217;t own a Sony DSLR.  I can say, however, that I do own many Nikon DSLRs.  I own the D70, D80, 3 D300s, and a D2X.  </p>
<p>I can say that in the $1,000 range, there is not much that touches the D80 when used with my Nikon glass.  Using cheaper lenses, I am sure the Sony does a great job, but when I use the 17-55 2.8 or the 70-200 2.8 on the D80, it is stunning to say the least.</p>
<p>I have not compared the Canon DSLRs in this range, but I just wanted to leave a quick comment.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-154523</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2008/01/31/new-sony-alphas-viable-competition-for-canon-and-nikon/#comment-154523</guid>
		<description>Ugo,
I totally agree with you that for most of our printing needs, megapixles don't matter.
Unfortunately Canon &#38; Sony (whom always seem to have +2 or 4 MP over competing Nikons in budget DSLRs) manage to sway so many innocent "megapixel hungry" buyers their way. If a user likes DOF preview + bracketing then it's understandable ... but to purely choose a budget DSLR on megapixels is not very smart decision. Very few actually realise that higher megapixels means more noise or noise processing that affects image quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugo,<br />
I totally agree with you that for most of our printing needs, megapixles don&#8217;t matter.<br />
Unfortunately Canon &amp; Sony (whom always seem to have +2 or 4 MP over competing Nikons in budget DSLRs) manage to sway so many innocent &#8220;megapixel hungry&#8221; buyers their way. If a user likes DOF preview + bracketing then it&#8217;s understandable &#8230; but to purely choose a budget DSLR on megapixels is not very smart decision. Very few actually realise that higher megapixels means more noise or noise processing that affects image quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
