<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On RDF as a storage medium</title>
	<link>http://agylen.com/2007/05/26/on-rdf-as-a-storage-medium/</link>
	<description>Ugo Cei's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Creswell</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2007/05/26/on-rdf-as-a-storage-medium/#comment-91930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Creswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2007/05/26/on-rdf-as-a-storage-medium/#comment-91930</guid>
		<description>You said:

"“Database refactoring is possible and practical.” and you shouldn’t be using some new, unproven technology just because refactoring and maintaining SQL databases is hard."

Urgh - that's a terrible argument to be trying to make.  If something is hard it's time to investigate/try other options which can be either revolution or evolution.  Both are about as valid as each other and which you try will be determined by your project risk profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said:</p>
<p>&#8220;“Database refactoring is possible and practical.” and you shouldn’t be using some new, unproven technology just because refactoring and maintaining SQL databases is hard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Urgh - that&#8217;s a terrible argument to be trying to make.  If something is hard it&#8217;s time to investigate/try other options which can be either revolution or evolution.  Both are about as valid as each other and which you try will be determined by your project risk profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
