<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight from the horse&#8217;s mouth</title>
	<link>http://agylen.com/2006/11/08/straight-from-the-horses-mouth/</link>
	<description>Ugo Cei's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agylen &#187; And GPL it is</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2006/11/08/straight-from-the-horses-mouth/#comment-39340</link>
		<dc:creator>Agylen &#187; And GPL it is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2006/11/08/straight-from-the-horses-mouth/#comment-39340</guid>
		<description>[...] With respect to the fears I have expressed about the core libraries being GPL as well, it looks like&#8212;according to Tim Bray&#8212; that they will use the Classpath Exception clause to avoid code using them to be infected by the GPL. I can&#8217;t even begin to wonder what the actual legal consequences of this are, but the spirit&#8212;if not the wording&#8212; of the clause seem pretty clear to me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] With respect to the fears I have expressed about the core libraries being GPL as well, it looks like&mdash;according to Tim Bray&mdash; that they will use the Classpath Exception clause to avoid code using them to be infected by the GPL. I can&#8217;t even begin to wonder what the actual legal consequences of this are, but the spirit&mdash;if not the wording&mdash; of the clause seem pretty clear to me. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
