<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What 9/11 conspiracy theorists miss</title>
	<link>http://agylen.com/2006/10/07/what-911-conspiracy-theorists-miss/</link>
	<description>Ugo Cei's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stinker</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2006/10/07/what-911-conspiracy-theorists-miss/#comment-56247</link>
		<dc:creator>stinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2006/10/07/what-911-conspiracy-theorists-miss/#comment-56247</guid>
		<description>Also, check out the book “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory” due out in March by Dr. David Ray Griffin. 

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&#38;EAN=9781566566865&#38;itm=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, check out the book “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory” due out in March by Dr. David Ray Griffin. </p>
<p><a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&amp;EAN=9781566566865&amp;itm=2" rel="nofollow">http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&amp;EAN=9781566566865&amp;itm=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig T. Furlong</title>
		<link>http://agylen.com/2006/10/07/what-911-conspiracy-theorists-miss/#comment-39096</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig T. Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://agylen.com/2006/10/07/what-911-conspiracy-theorists-miss/#comment-39096</guid>
		<description>No one has debunked this yet…and it’s not a “theory”—just the facts.
“Plane Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup &#38; Complicity

“Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”
Link: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong &#38; Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times.  What can this factual contradiction mean?  Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)  

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40? 
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes:
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as “plane impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone.  It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.  This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.
Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has debunked this yet…and it’s not a “theory”—just the facts.<br />
“Plane Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup &amp; Complicity</p>
<p>“Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”<br />
Link: <a href="http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc" rel="nofollow">http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc</a><br />
By Craig T. Furlong &amp; Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: <a href="http://www.st911.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.st911.org</a></p>
<p>The official times for plane &#8220;impact&#8221; [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times.  What can this factual contradiction mean?  Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:</p>
<p>One World Trade, September 11, 2001<br />
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:<br />
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)<br />
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)  </p>
<p>Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?<br />
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.<br />
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?</p>
<p>Notes:<br />
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as “plane impact”).<br />
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact time.<br />
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.</p>
<p>Summary:<br />
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone.  It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building.  This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.</p>
<p>Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.<br />
Justice waits&#8230;{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
