Comments on: Ruby for Java Programmers, Part II

By: Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part V

Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part V — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:29:20 +0000

[…] If you’ve been following the previous articles in this series (Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV) but are not yet satisfied with the range of solutions I presented for calling Ruby code from Java, here’s another one for you. […]

By: Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part IV

Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part IV — Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:59:43 +0000

[…] In the previous installments of this series, I did some experiments trying to make Java and Ruby coexist by using two bridges: rjb and YAJB. This time, I’m going to try to solve the same problem using JRuby. […]

By: Patrick Chanezon

Patrick Chanezon — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:41:07 +0000

Very cool Ugo: I’ve always considered the few ruby libraries I found for parsing feeds pretty lame, but I’m too lazy to port ROME to ruby.
Going native is a good idea.

PS: we released ROME 0.8 a few minutes ago, we now support Atom 1.0.
cf http://blog.chanezon.com/articles/2006/02/01/rome-0-8-released-now-support-atom-1-0-rfc-4287

By: Dave Brondsema's Blog

Dave Brondsema's Blog — Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:15:46 +0000

code reuse, meta-indexes

Ugo Cei’s recent posts about using Java from Ruby have made me start thinking about such code re-use. Code re-use is obviously a good thing. Very often there are tools out there that do what you need. If it works with the language you are using, an…

By: ugo

ugo — Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:06:41 +0000

What you get from feed.getEntries is a java.util.Collection. If you’re asking whether it wouls be possible to just do “feed.getEntries.each do …”, well the answer is no.

By: Carfield Yim

Carfield Yim — Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:36:02 +0000

I support you don’t need to write while loop but able to use Ruby closure, right?

Or rjb require you not to use closure?