Comments on: Ruby for Java Programmers, Part II http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/ Ugo Cei's Weblog Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:35:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: pravin http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-428433 pravin Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:04:39 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-428433 It possible to call Java class from ruby app using RJB. But how do we call/invoke ruby app methods from the JAVA application? Any pointers on this will be really helpful. It possible to call Java class from ruby app using RJB.
But how do we call/invoke ruby app methods from the JAVA application?
Any pointers on this will be really helpful.

]]> By: Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part V http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1216 Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part V Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:29:20 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1216 [...] If you’ve been following the previous articles in this series (Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV) but are not yet satisfied with the range of solutions I presented for calling Ruby code from Java, here’s another one for you. [...] [...] If you’ve been following the previous articles in this series (Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV) but are not yet satisfied with the range of solutions I presented for calling Ruby code from Java, here’s another one for you. [...]

]]> By: Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part IV http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1150 Agylen » Ruby for Java Programmers, Part IV Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:59:43 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1150 [...] In the previous installments of this series, I did some experiments trying to make Java and Ruby coexist by using two bridges: rjb and YAJB. This time, I’m going to try to solve the same problem using JRuby. [...] [...] In the previous installments of this series, I did some experiments trying to make Java and Ruby coexist by using two bridges: rjb and YAJB. This time, I’m going to try to solve the same problem using JRuby. [...]

]]> By: Patrick Chanezon http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1135 Patrick Chanezon Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:41:07 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1135 Very cool Ugo: I've always considered the few ruby libraries I found for parsing feeds pretty lame, but I'm too lazy to port ROME to ruby. Going native is a good idea. PS: we released ROME 0.8 a few minutes ago, we now support Atom 1.0. cf http://blog.chanezon.com/articles/2006/02/01/rome-0-8-released-now-support-atom-1-0-rfc-4287 Very cool Ugo: I’ve always considered the few ruby libraries I found for parsing feeds pretty lame, but I’m too lazy to port ROME to ruby.
Going native is a good idea.

PS: we released ROME 0.8 a few minutes ago, we now support Atom 1.0.
cf http://blog.chanezon.com/articles/2006/02/01/rome-0-8-released-now-support-atom-1-0-rfc-4287

]]> By: Dave Brondsema's Blog http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1115 Dave Brondsema's Blog Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:15:46 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1115 <strong>code reuse, meta-indexes</strong> Ugo Cei's recent posts about using Java from Ruby have made me start thinking about such code re-use. Code re-use is obviously a good thing. Very often there are tools out there that do what you need. If it works with the language you are using, an... code reuse, meta-indexes

Ugo Cei’s recent posts about using Java from Ruby have made me start thinking about such code re-use. Code re-use is obviously a good thing. Very often there are tools out there that do what you need. If it works with the language you are using, an…

]]> By: ugo http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1112 ugo Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:06:41 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1112 What you get from feed.getEntries is a java.util.Collection. If you're asking whether it wouls be possible to just do "feed.getEntries.each do ...", well the answer is no. What you get from feed.getEntries is a java.util.Collection. If you’re asking whether it wouls be possible to just do “feed.getEntries.each do …”, well the answer is no.

]]> By: Carfield Yim http://agylen.com/2006/01/25/ruby-for-java-programmers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1111 Carfield Yim Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:36:02 +0000 http://agylen.com/?p=835#comment-1111 I support you don't need to write while loop but able to use Ruby closure, right? Or rjb require you not to use closure? I support you don’t need to write while loop but able to use Ruby closure, right?

Or rjb require you not to use closure?

]]>