Comments on: Mozilla Rhino to be included in J2SE 6.0 http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/ Ugo Cei's Weblog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:05:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: ugo http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-109 ugo Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:59:47 +0000 http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-109 I was under the impression that Javaflow wasn't as stable as Javascript Flow, but this is probably due to my not having followed its development closely of late. I was under the impression that Javaflow wasn’t as stable as Javascript Flow, but this is probably due to my not having followed its development closely of late.

]]> By: Sylvain Wallez http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-108 Sylvain Wallez Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:25:36 +0000 http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-108 Rhino is "the only working [flowscript] implementation right now"? Hey Ugo, we also have JavaFlow (continuations in pure Java) and the less known Apples (weird name BTW) which is heavily used by the Daisy CMS! Rhino is “the only working [flowscript] implementation right now”?

Hey Ugo, we also have JavaFlow (continuations in pure Java) and the less known Apples (weird name BTW) which is heavily used by the Daisy CMS!

]]> By: verbat http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-106 verbat Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:18:39 +0000 http://agylen.com/2005/06/12/mozilla-rhino-to-be-included-in-j2se-60/#comment-106 Someone ever shown interest in continuations for groovy? I think a better bet would be asking when #callcc would be implemented in JRuby since ruby-the-language already has that Someone ever shown interest in continuations for groovy?
I think a better bet would be asking when #callcc would be implemented in JRuby since ruby-the-language already has that

]]>